Biomedical Engineering Profession – An Overview and Global Comparison of Staffing Criteria and Workforce

Main Article Content

Sambhu Ramesh
Kavita Kachroo
Nitturi Naresh Kumar
Mrutunjay Jena
Manisha Panda

Abstract

Introduction: Biomedical Engineering is a specialized profession that incorporates engineering, science, technology, and medicine competence and responsibilities. A biomedical engineer who works at hospital and manages the biomedical engineering department by integrating all the health care technologies for patient safety is called a clinical engineer.
Methodology: Rapid literature on the workforce as well as staffing criterion has been done by searching in PubMed, google scholar and relevant websites.
Results: Variations in the staffing criteria exist across all the world. There are multiple staffing criterions put forward by various health system agencies. However, a standardised staffing criterion is lacking in many countries. The conventional staffing pattern developed primarily on the basis of number of patients needs to be modified by incorporating multiple components such as the nature of care delivery, number of biomedical devices used, average number of maintenance work orders received etc. The procurement and maintenance of biomedical devices are often get disrupted in developing countries due to inadequate staffing. Low-income countries depend on donations for procurement of medical devices, however most of these devices will stop working within a period of 5 years due to lack of maintenance.
Conclusion: Developing an appropriate job description specific to the county and adopting a standardised staffing pattern could contribute immensely to the medical workforce as well as improving the quality of medical care.
Manuscript Highlights
This paper provides an overview of considerations used to develop staffing criteria for biomedical engineers across the globe. The paper also does a multicounty comparison on biomedical workforce published by the World Health Organisation in order to determine the various factors to be considered for developing a staffing criterion. High income countries like Australia, Canada and USA follows standards according to their requirements whereas the LMICs doesn’t follows a framed criterion. The paper discusses various models available in place which are used by various health administrative agencies to consider developing and regulating the staffing standards of biomedical engineers in their respective regions. The paper examines the health regulations considering the biomedical engineer staffing criterions developed by regulatory and administrative agencies from different countries. Based on all these analyses, recommendations are made on criterions to be considered for developing staffing pattern and implementing regulatory body for biomedical engineering profession.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ramesh, S., Kachroo, K. ., Naresh Kumar, N., Jena, M. ., & Panda, M. (2022). Biomedical Engineering Profession – An Overview and Global Comparison of Staffing Criteria and Workforce. International Journal of Health Technology and Innovation, 1(03), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.60142/ijhti.v1i03.46
Section
Review Articles

References

Samantha Jacques, Barbara Christe, Introduction to Clinical Engineering, 1st Ed, Cambridge: Academic press; 2020.

Antonio Miguel Cruz & Mayra R. Guarín (2017) Determinants in the number of staff in hospitals’ maintenance departments: a multivariate regression analysis approach, Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 41:2, 151-164.

WHO publications (medical devices) [Internet]. IFMBE. 2016 [cited 2022 Jul 28]. Available from: https://ifmbe.org/who-medical-devices-pub

A. F. Alkhateeb, J. M. Al Amri and M. A. Hussain, "Healthcare Facility Variables Important to Biomedical Staffing in Line with 2030 Saudi Vision," 2019 Industrial & Systems Engineering Conference (ISEC), 2019, pp. 1-6,

Ilo.org. [cited 2022 Jul 28]. Available from:

https://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/isco/docs/publication08.pdf

Joseph Bronzino, biomedical engineering: a historical

perspective, Editor(s): John D. Enderle, Susan M. Blanchard, Joseph D. Bronzino, In Biomedical Engineering, Introduction to Biomedical Engineering (Second Edition), Academic Press, 2005, Pages 1-29,.

McHugh , Aiken LH, Eckenhoff ME, Burns LR. Achieving Kaiser

Permanente quality. Health Care Manage Rev. 2016 Jul-Sep;41(3):178-88. PMID: 26131607; PMCID: PMC4892964.

Mandot P, Ibey AA. Biomedical Engineering Department staff analysis: The Ottawa Hospital productivity review [Internet]. Accenet.org. [cited 2022 Jul 28]. Available from:

https://accenet.org/publications/Downloads/Reference%20Materials/PMandot_Bi omedical%20Engineering%20Dept%20Staff%20productivity%20Analysis.pdf

Successful measures | HFM | Health Facilities Management [Internet]. [cited 2022 Apr21].Available from: https://www.hfmmagazine.com/articles/958-successfulmeasures

Antonio Miguel Cruz & Mayra R. Guarín (2017) Determinants in the number of staff in hospitals’ maintenance departments: a multivariate regression analysis approach, Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 41:2, 151-164.

Wang, Binseng Rui et.al. Clinical Engineering Productivity and Staffing Revisited, Journal of Clinical Engineering: October/December 2012 - Volume 37 - Issue 4 - p 135-145

Cohen T. Staffing metrics: a case study. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2011 Jul-Aug;45(4):321-3. PMID: 21812612.

Hossain MA, Ahmad M, Islam MR, David Y. Mathematical modelling of clinical engineering approach to evaluate the quality of patient care. Health Technol (Berl). 2020;10(2):547-561.Epub 2019 Nov 24.

Lamberti C, Panfili A, Gnudi G, Avanzolini G. A new model to estimate the appropriate staff for a clinical engineering department. J Clin Eng. 1997 SepOct;22(5):335-41

Biomedical equipment management and maintenance program: technical guidance document for in-house support and monitoring of public private partnerships.

ministry of Health & Family Welfare government of India, New-Delhi Available at https://nhm.gov.in/New_Updates_2018/NHM_Components/Health_System_Stregthening/Comprehensive_primary_health_care/letter/BMMP_Technical%20Manual.pdf

Nabh.co. 2020 [cited 2022 Jul 28]. Available from:

https://www.nabh.co/images/Standards/NABH%205%20STD%20April%202020.pdf

Who.int. 2022. GHO. [online]Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho [Accessed 12 May 2022]

Moh.gov.bt.2022[online]Available from :<https://www.moh.gov.bt/wpcontent/uploads/moh-files/BioEngServices.pdf> [Accessed 12 May 2022].

Marks IH, Thomas H, Bakhet M, Fitzgerald E. Medical equipment donation in low-resource settings: a review of the literature and guidelines for surgery and anaesthesia in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Global Health. 2019 Sep 1;4(5): e001785.

Global Clinical Engineering alliance [Internet]. Globalcea.org. [cited 2022 Aug 3]. Available from: https://www.globalcea.org/home

Home [Internet]. Ewh.org. [cited 2022 Aug 3]. Available from:

https://www.ewh.org/

Institution of Mechanical Engineers. biomedical engineering: advancing UK healthcare [Internet]. Southampton.ac.uk. 2014 [cited 2022 Aug 3]. Available from: http://www.southampton.ac.uk/~nwb/lectures/SESM6036_Papers/imechebiomedical-report.pdf

Wsu.edu. [cited 2022 Aug 3]. Available from:

https://s3.wp.wsu.edu/uploads/sites/734/2016/09/PtD_Bioengineering-Lesson_2Assessing_Risk_in_Projects-WSU.pptm

Marks IH, Thomas H, Bakhet M, Fitzgerald E. Medical equipment donation in low-resource settings: a review of the literature and guidelines for surgery and anaesthesia in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health

[Internet].2019;4(5):e001785. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh2019-001785

Hossain MA, Ahmad M, Islam MR, David Y. Evaluation of performance outcomes of medical equipment technology management and patient safety: Skilled clinical engineer’s approach. Glob Clin Eng J [Internet]. 2019;1(2):4–16. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.31354/globalce.v1i2.46